Representation in Modern Transformational Syntax
نویسنده
چکیده
The general issue of derivational vs. representational approaches to syntax has received considerable attention throughout the history of generative grammar. Internal to the major derivational approach, transformational grammar, a related issue arises: are well-formedness conditions imposed specifically at the particular levels of representation made available in the theory, or are they imposed “internal” to the derivation leading to those levels? This second question will be the topic of this chapter. Like the first question, it is a subtle one, perhaps even more subtle than the first, but since Chomsky (1973), there has been increasing investigation of it, and important argument and evidence have been brought to bear. I will be examining a range of arguments, some old and some new, concerning (i) locality constraints on movement, and (ii) the property forcing (overt) movement, especially as this issue arises within the “minimalist” program of Chomsky (1995b).
منابع مشابه
Lexical Functional Grammar
The term Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) first appeared in print in the 1982 volume edited by Joan Bresnan: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, the culmination of many years of research. LFG differs from both transformational grammar and relational grammar in assuming a single level of syntactic structure. LFG rejects syntactic movement of constituents as the mechanism by which...
متن کاملComputational Complexity and Lexical Funtional Grammar
An important goal of modern linguistic theory is to characterize as narrowly as possible the class of natural languages. One classical approach to this characterization has been to investigate the generative capacity of grammatical systems specifiable within particular linguistic theories. Formal results along these lines have already been obtained for certain kinds of Transformational Generat ...
متن کاملCapturing Linguistic Generalizations with Metarules in an Annotated Phrase-Structure Grammar
1. Introduction Computational models employed by current natural language understanding systems rely on phrase-structure representations of syntax. Whether implemented as augmented transition nets, BNF grammars, annotated phrase-structure grammars, or similar methods, a phrase-structure representation makes the parsing problem computatlonally tractable [7]. However, phrase-structure representat...
متن کاملNominal Structures and Structural Recursion
It is possible within Tree Adjoining Grammar to reproduce many of the syntactic analyses originally formulated by linguists in transformational terms. To the extent that these analyses are well-motivated empirically, this fact makes TAG interesting for use in developing computational learning and processing models (Joshi 1990, Frank 1992, Rambow 1994), since the use of other non-transformationa...
متن کاملTen Choices for Lexical Semantics
The modern computational lexical semantics reached a point in its development when it has become necessary to define the premises and goals of each of its several trends. This paper proposes ten choices in terms of which these premises and goals can be discussed. It is argued that the central questions include the use of lexical rules for generating word senses; the role of syntax, pragmatics, ...
متن کامل